研究揭示原生统一多模态模型中理解与生成的协同机制

内容摘要
研究揭示了原生统一多模态模型(UMMs)中理解与生成的协同机制。研究发现,在表示层面,生成和理解任务相互提供有用信号,但若两者通过相同计算路径,则可能导致一方主导。通过任务解耦架构,可以避免这种不对称退化。在任务层面,当理解与生成任务依赖共享知识时,发现正向双向迁移。在系统层面,端到端UMM在需要图像理解和生成的复杂任务上优于匹配的规划-执行管道。这些结果表明,UMMs的价值不仅限于统一的接口,适当的专门化、共享任务知识和端到端优化可以将共存转化为协同。
研究揭示了原生统一多模态模型(UMMs)中理解与生成的协同机制。研究发现,在表示层面,生成和理解任务相互提供有用信号,但若两者通过相同计算路径,则可能导致一方主导。通过任务解耦架构,可以避免这种不对称退化。在任务层面,当理解与生成任务依赖共享知识时,发现正向双向迁移。在系统层面,端到端UMM在需要图像理解和生成的复杂任务上优于匹配的规划-执行管道。这些结果表明,UMMs的价值不仅限于统一的接口,适当的专门化、共享任务知识和端到端优化可以将共存转化为协同。

While unified multimodal models (UMMs) jointly perform visual understanding and generation within a single model, functional unification does not guarantee learning synergy: the two objectives may reinforce each other, compete for capacity, or merely coexist. We investigate their relationship at the representation, task, and system levels in a controlled, structurally native setting without pretrained vision priors. At the representation level, we find that each objective provides useful signal to the other: generation enriches the visual features learned for understanding, while understanding strengthens vision--language alignment for generation. However, when both objectives are forced through the same computation path, one tends to dominate. A task-decoupled architecture that specializes conflicting visual computation while preserving semantic interaction avoids this asymmetric degradation. At the task level, through three case studies, we find positive bidirectional transfer when understanding and generation tasks rely on shared knowledge. At the system level, we show that an end-to-end UMM outperforms a matched planner--executor pipeline on complex tasks that explicitly require both image understanding and generation. Together, these results show that the value of UMMs extends beyond a unified interface: appropriate specialization, shared task knowledge, and end-to-end optimization can turn coexistence into synergy.

原始发布方:HuggingFace Daily Papers(社区热门论文)

原文时间:2026-09-01 08:00:00 +08:00

阅读原文 · 数据来源:AIHOT

提示

本文用于信息整理与经验分享。第三方订阅、支付及账号服务可能调整,实际规则、价格和可用性请以下单页面及服务方最新说明为准。

咨询 GPT 充值咨询充值